3 ms·
Part of me wonders why only 6 years. It doesn't seem like someone who would do this has much respect for the sport.
by OneOneOneOne 10y ago
Part of me wonders why only 6 years.
It doesn't seem like someone who would do this has much respect for the sport.
- celticninja 10y agoIf it put you out of the sport permanently then it could be assumed to be long enough.
- mgberlin 10y agoBecause six years for a 19 year old cyclist is essentially a lifetime ban. There is little to no chance of her returning to the sport after that kind of extended absence.
- poooogles 10y agoIt's enough to destroy her career which is all they really needed to do. To do it you have to have no respect at all. Sure EPO is awful, but an extra 200 watts for no extra work is a different level.
- soperj 10y agoIt's really not. At least it doesn't fuck her body up for the rest of her life. Because everyone was taking EPO, to compete you had to take EPO.
- 21 10y agoEven murder, in most countries, has a limit at around 20 years or so.
- jakelarkin 10y agoI dunno, it seems pretty harsh given that drug doping cases on the men's side only receive 2 to 4 years for a first offense [1] and given it's not something she could have gone out and done on her own - coach and mechanics must have been highly complicit and were probably driving the use of the cheat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doping_cases_in_cycling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doping_cases_in_cyclin...
- OneOneOneOne 10y agoNone of those guys showed up with a 'motorcycle.' Granted the motor didn't do all the work. I think she would have used a more powerful motor if she could have gotten away with it.