4 ms·
I think there's a really strong culture of not wanting to look too deep into football's affairs. Football is a massive cash machine, and everyone involved stand
by patrickk 10y ago
I think there's a really strong culture of not wanting to look too deep into football's affairs. Football is a massive cash machine, and everyone involved stands to lose money if this (obvious, in my view) scandal breaks. This includes the football media.
I mean how is it possible that the likes of Messi and Ronaldo batter domestic teams on the weekend and batter European opposition mid-week, week in, week out for years and years at a stretch and almost never get injured? How does Giggs play football at 40 like he's 20 years younger? How does Leicester play high tempo, counter-attacking football at breakneck pace against teams with x10 the budget? Maybe it's Ranieri's special pizza toppings and some statistical voodoo that somhow the Arsenals and Manchester Uniteds of this world are too stupid to realise.
- sambe 10y agoPeople like to believe their favourite sports are clean. Some sports are considering "druggy" like cycling and baseball. Fans of sports where it has not been completely unearthed simply won't believe it. I find it easy to say but hard to internalise myself. As mentioned elsewhere there's been a fair amount of rug sweeping in football (Spain, Italy, UK libel laws quoted against investigative journalists, Chelsea blood spinning) and plenty of incentive to keep it looking clean. But none of that is specific to Leicester.
- century19 10y agoThe article I quoted was about a doctor drugging hundreds of atheletes and he named Leicester in the undercover sting. That's what I was getting at. He could be the reason for their success.