4 ms·

She had to go, regardless of the immediate consequences. Yes Temer, Cunha and the others are thieves. THIEVES. However so is Lula and also, Dilma. Unless she is

She had to go, regardless of the immediate consequences. Yes Temer, Cunha and the others are thieves. THIEVES. However so is Lula and also, Dilma. Unless she is chronically, grossly, impossibly negligent and incompetent, she knew what went on in Petrobras regardless of what the kangaroo inquiry who condemned no one of matter said. $2B dollars went down the drain. She had to go.

verganileonardo 11y ago
Is there any proof of what you just said?
- felipebrnd 11y ago
  I believe he is talking about the Pasadena case, that was a really strange deal and a lot of people condemned back there.
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
- felipebrnd 11y ago
  I was doing some research on Pasadena case, and found this https://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://sistemas2.cgu.gov.br/relats/uploads/6677_%2520Relatorio%2520-%2520Petrobras%2520-%2520Refinaria%2520de%2520Pasadena.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwilloeY7a7MAhUDxpAKHXAtDHEQFghkMBI&usg=AFQjCNGDsa5Y7ZHIAAgDG0VN13uvLb_I2Q&sig2=ykr5hL0POaCn-LXLyGpdxw https://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http...
- malandrew 11y ago
  Given the way the president would be investigated and tried, it's almost impossible to even begin collecting evidence or following any leads. The only reason Operation Lava-Jato was able to start investigating Lula is because he was no longer president, but he gained immunity when Lula was appointed Dilma's chief of staff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_In%C3%A1cio_Lula_da_Silva#Corruption_investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_In%C3%A1cio_Lula_da_Silva... There is at least enough proof that Dilma went out of her way to end a lead in investigations that would have led to her if she is/was involved.
mhkool 11y ago
Dilma probably is chronically, grossly, impossibly negligent and incompetent. And she was choosen by the people to be president so she must be president. There is not a single piece of evidence that indicates that Dilma could be a thief, or that she broke any law. So she has to stay. She has to stay to prevent that the thieves like Temer and Cunha take over.

verganileonardo 11y ago

Is there any proof of what you just said?

felipebrnd 11y ago
I believe he is talking about the Pasadena case, that was a really strange deal and a lot of people condemned back there.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
felipebrnd 11y ago
I was doing some research on Pasadena case, and found this https://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://sistemas2.cgu.gov.br/relats/uploads/6677_%2520Relatorio%2520-%2520Petrobras%2520-%2520Refinaria%2520de%2520Pasadena.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwilloeY7a7MAhUDxpAKHXAtDHEQFghkMBI&usg=AFQjCNGDsa5Y7ZHIAAgDG0VN13uvLb_I2Q&sig2=ykr5hL0POaCn-LXLyGpdxw https://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http...
malandrew 11y ago
Given the way the president would be investigated and tried, it's almost impossible to even begin collecting evidence or following any leads. The only reason Operation Lava-Jato was able to start investigating Lula is because he was no longer president, but he gained immunity when Lula was appointed Dilma's chief of staff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_In%C3%A1cio_Lula_da_Silva#Corruption_investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_In%C3%A1cio_Lula_da_Silva... There is at least enough proof that Dilma went out of her way to end a lead in investigations that would have led to her if she is/was involved.

mhkool 11y ago

Dilma probably is chronically, grossly, impossibly negligent and incompetent. And she was choosen by the people to be president so she must be president. There is not a single piece of evidence that indicates that Dilma could be a thief, or that she broke any law. So she has to stay. She has to stay to prevent that the thieves like Temer and Cunha take over.