3 ms·
Probably off topic, but how do you get such a sort to work nicely (sorting on count from another table), without creating redundant data (in this case, maintain
by siddhant 10y ago
Probably off topic, but how do you get such a sort to work nicely (sorting on count from another table), without creating redundant data (in this case, maintaining the +1 count in the main issue table as well as maintaining a separate table for +1s), or just delegating the sort to an external search service?
- takno 10y agoThere's no obvious reason why it would be particularly slow to get counts from another table. You're probably going to want to offer full text searches and searches on columns you wouldn't choose to index online as well though, at which point using a search service makes most sense