3 ms·
There's a difference between being against any use of force that could have collateral damage, and firing anti-tank missiles into populated areas. The former is
by rl3 11y ago
There's a difference between being against any use of force that could have collateral damage, and firing anti-tank missiles into populated areas. The former is tragic, the latter is sheer stupidity.
Fortunately weaponized lasers are coming. Those should succeed in reducing collateral damage almost entirely. All that needs fixing after that is the often-faulty intelligence, and weeding out gung-ho idiot drone operators.