3 ms·
How many people work jobs today that are akin in nature / level of fulfillment to inventing multiplication? How many people work jobs that are best done by a ma
by dota_fanatic 10y ago
How many people work jobs today that are akin in nature / level of fulfillment to inventing multiplication? How many people work jobs that are best done by a machine? How much energy does it take for a human intelligence to do these jobs vs a machine? How many people are furthermore stunted in their growth due to forced submission to their middle managers, a power differential that hardly need exist but feels great for the manager (king in their little castle)?
I'm pretty sure computers, as we currently understand them, are entirely capable of inventing multiplication, provided sufficient source code and input. Evolution is unique in being able to "create" a thing that can formalize multiplication? Human intelligence is not magic.
- beat 10y agoHuman intelligence is not magic, but it is categorically different from machine intelligence. What's amazing isn't that Deep Blue could beat Kasparov, given the depth of analysis it could do. What's amazing is that Kasparov could beat Deep Blue, despite not being able to analyze thousands of possible moves a second in his head.
- fossuser 10y agoI think Alpha Go is more in the category of human intelligence. My probably oversimplified understanding is that the neural network training on a massive amount of games develops something like intuition. It can't explain why a certain move it makes is the best, but only that it is the most likely to win. This seems similar to advanced human play.
- ArkyBeagle 10y agoOne heuristic is that anything that is AI that actually works gets reclassified as something else. Are Kalman filters machine intelligence? It sort of doesn't matter, really.