3 ms·
LMAO....you literally just said prior to this comment: "We are not trying to ensure there is an "arbitrary number" of certain types of people working in our fi
by j4kp07 10y ago
LMAO....you literally just said prior to this comment:
"We are not trying to ensure there is an "arbitrary number" of certain types of people working in our field."
You are a walking Poster Child for hypocrisy.
- interpol_p 10y agoHow does sharing such stats imply achieving "arbitrary numbers" in any sense? I am pointing at data showing a large disparity in tech employment relative to the population. Women are equally as capable as men when it comes to tech, so we should expect equal representation. We don't get equal representation because of existing cultural biases against women in this field. It's the same reason we don't get equal representation of men in many "women's" fields where men are clearly as capable as women.
- gremy0 10y ago> so we should expect equal representation This is conjecture. > We don't get equal representation because of existing cultural biases against women in this field. As is this. You are pointing to data and making your own conclusions that the data simply isn't complete enough to show.
- j4kp07 10y ago> How does sharing such stats imply achieving "arbitrary numbers" in any sense? Are you really that ignorant? > Women are equally as capable as men when it comes to tech, so we should expect equal representation. And why are there not more women collecting trash or sweeping our streets (90% male)? And why are there not more men teaching our children in K-12 (80% female)? Obviously men are just as capable and just as smart.