3 ms·
>And yet did those organizations, which people rightly consider to be bad, actually do anything worse than the CIA has been doing in the last 70 years? The ave
by ikeboy 11y ago
>And yet did those organizations, which people rightly consider to be bad, actually do anything worse than the CIA has been doing in the last 70 years?
The average American is not personally affected by anything the CIA does. Can the same be said about the KGB?
- pjc50 11y agoYou'd be hard pressed to find an instance where an average American civilian was affected by the KGB per se. Remember that most of the Cold War was a proxy war, fought in the middle east and South America. The FSB their successor did assassinate a dissident in London (Litvinenko), which the UK government ignored until Russia became sufficiently persona non grata lately.
- ikeboy 11y agoI meant to ask whether the average Russian was affected by the KGB.
- hartpuff 11y agoAIUI the CIA is not supposed to operate domestically, so the comparison between the two is not exact (I don't believe the CIA would operate domestically the same way as the KGB did anyway, though, but the KGB was basically just helping to prop up an openly tyrannical state), but even if the KGB has the CIA beat on home turf, I think the CIA 'wins' abroad. Even just taking the example in this thread, a monstrous program of 'black sites' set up around the world specifically to torture innocent people indefinitely, where is the KGB version? Leaving aside any comparisons, if they're a distraction, why is an organization that does the terrible things the CIA has done throughout its history not only tolerated in a civilized democracy, but actually still viewed generally positively?
- ikeboy 11y ago> a monstrous program of 'black sites' set up around the world specifically to torture innocent people indefinitely I'm pretty sure everyone involved thought the person was not innocent. This is not a fair description. Also, as far as I can tell the claim is just that he wasn't part of al-Qaida or some of the other stuff he was accused of, not that he's completely innocent. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Zubaydah#Biography_and_early_activities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Zubaydah#Biography_and_ear... >Zubaydah eventually became involved in the jihad training site known as the Khalden training camp, where he oversaw the flow of recruits and obtained passports and paperwork for men transferring out of Khalden.
- hartpuff 11y agoI was thinking more generally, about the fact that these sites are set up and used specifically to avoid due process. I mean by definition, the people being tortured, not having been found guilty of any crime, are innocent.
- ikeboy 11y ago>not having been found guilty of any crime, are innocent. That's not what innocent means. You should use unconvicted.
- hartpuff 11y agoWhy I should use "unconvicted", which implies possible guilt, for people who have not even been charged with anything, but are simply imprisoned and/or tortured indefinitely?