4 ms·
From what I understand this mostly effects servers and not desktop systems because most desktops don't have NUMA. I've noticed that Linux servers typically run
by zxcvcxz 10y ago
From what I understand this mostly effects servers and not desktop systems because most desktops don't have NUMA. I've noticed that Linux servers typically run on par (usually better) than their windows counterparts when it comes to performance.
Could this be an indication that Windows could also be suffering from some similar bug?
Once this bug is fixed in Linux it could supposedly improve performance by up to 30% in some cases. Linux is already performing on par with Windows (and this isn't really debatable), so does this mean that this patch help Linux out-perform Windows by much wider margins now?
- pritambaral 10y ago> Could this be an indication that Windows could also be suffering from some similar bug? No. Linux and Windows vary greatly. If the only difference between the two OSes were in the scheduler, maybe then we could say Windows also suffers from a similar bug. But there are so many other working parts to a modern OS that Windows could be slower than Linux despite having a more efficient scheduler.
- 13of40 10y ago> and this isn't really debatable Citation?