5 ms·
I would say Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. You can make good progress very quickly, it's a lot of fun, can be very demanding physically (but doesn't always have to) and i
by sgdesign 17y ago
I would say Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. You can make good progress very quickly, it's a lot of fun, can be very demanding physically (but doesn't always have to) and is called "chess on the mat" which should appeal to a programmer's analytical minds.
Plus, there's a ton of BJJ ressources on the net and the community is very active.
- robg 17y agoI really enjoyed BJJ for the short time I tried it. The problem is I could easily see overpaying for it, with poor teachers, in the current MMA context. My other concern is that it's more grappling than contact, which seems less practical. I had a strong background in wrestling (4 years) and Karate (5 years) by that point. I really liked it, but I'm not sure it's right for a beginner.
- wyclif 17y agoMy other concern is that it's more grappling than contact Grappling isn't contact?
- robg 17y agoPoor choice of words. At that distance, you don't know what happens, and how to respond, when your bell gets rung.
- scott_s 17y agoThen also do MMA ground-and-pound drills if that concerns you. I find my BJJ base (purple belt) helps immensely when I have someone in my guard trying to punch me in the face.
- robg 17y agoIn practical circumstances, I don't know why I'd willingly go to the ground, especially against someone bigger (and usually that's what bullies are). And I say that as a former wrestler.
- scott_s 17y agoSometimes you don't have a choice.
- starkfist 17y agoAll martial artists know from extensive research on internet forums, that 99% of street fights go to the ground.
- jeromec 17y agoVery true. Martial arts have different beneficial aspects, but if your only concern is winning street fights, from my understanding all you really have to do is become an accomplished boxer and wrestler.
- ryanelkins 17y agoBy "contact" he means strikes such as punches, kicks, etc.
- wyclif 17y agoBrazilian Jiu-Jitsu is very appealing to me because it's very "realist." In a real-world fight or confrontation between 2 people, most of the time (above 90%, I think) the combatants wind up on the ground. BJJ really teaches the student how to deal with fights on the ground. If you're in a ground fight, you need to know how to control the centre of gravity as well as the numerous holds and limb locks.
- robg 17y agoThe problem is if you're a beginner, you think those locks are easy in the real-world. Meanwhile, you're getting punched and kicked in the head. Staying on your feet and knowing when to run like hell is just as important a skill, as is avoiding getting hit. BJJ works well in a cage and between two people. Keep in mind that's a very controlled environment.
- scott_s 17y agoThe problem is if you're a beginner, you think those locks are easy in the real-world. That's going to be true of any discipline one starts training in. For example, I think boxing is a great way to learn stand-up self-defense, but a beginner is still going to be susceptible to someone who wants to clinch or go to the ground. Everyone has to start somewhere. Also, if you're a beginner in BJJ, you should learn very quickly that those locks aren't even easy when live rolling.
- wyclif 17y agoBJJ works well in a cage and between two people BJJ works well between two people. There, fixed that for you. Please don't confuse UFC matches with applied BJJ, just because Gracie won the first few.
- ryanelkins 17y agoNo, the original was right. You'll find it loses its effectiveness when you clinch someone who then stabs you repeatedly. Or perhaps you roll across a large piece of glass or get your head bashed against a curb or pavement. I think BJJ is great for what it is but I hate to see people confuse it for something it isn't.
- grk 17y agoBJJ is great, but: get a brazilian teacher if possible, and avoid BJJ if you have any knee problems, I messed mine up.