Placing [sic] into a paraphrasing is just misleading. 0) You asked, "What information is associated to [nodes and edges]?". In this example, one piece of infor

Placing [sic] into a paraphrasing is just misleading. 0) You asked, "What information is associated to [nodes and edges]?". In this example, one piece of information is the direction of an edge. 1) I don't think I claimed they were the same. In fact, I am claiming that one can be represented by the other and vice versa. a) yes, that is part of the reason I conject that each graph may be associated with an "infinite number" of computations and/or representations b) also a reason -- there are perhaps an infinite number of languages, interpreters, compilers, etc. (some of which may produce the same result) for a given graph. 2) It was only an observation that the comment I responded to claimed only a subset of the truth. Anything done on a computer can be considered as a graph.