4 ms·
Tl;dr: The Boston Globe website tries to get people to subscribe. Also, the locution "dark patterns" in the headline is a weird term that is, frankly, more dec
by malchow 11y ago
Tl;dr: The Boston Globe website tries to get people to subscribe.
Also, the locution "dark patterns" in the headline is a weird term that is, frankly, more deceptive than anything the writer purports to reveal the Globe does.
- thaumasiotes 11y agoWell, like it or not, "dark pattern" is the standard term for this sort of thing. Some of the examples being called out are defensible; some aren't: > Before you can read the article, there is a pop-up ad asking you to subscribe. By itself, this is annoying, but not deceptive. The real dark pattern is hidden at the top – the ‘Close’ button (circled in red) uses a very low contrast font, making it hard to see. It’s also in the left corner, not the standard right corner. This makes it likely that users won’t see it, causing them to subscribe when they didn’t have to. > A Boston Globe reader can subscribe online. If they have a question, they can ask over email, or through a convenient live chat service. But if they want to stop paying, they have to call and ask on the phone
- mercer 11y agohonestly I think 'dark pattern' is too mild a way to put it and 'deception' is more accurate. If the whole point of this 'pattern' is to get someone to do something they don't actually want to do, how is that not deception?
- pluma 11y agoExcept "dark patterns" are a thing and what the Globe does is exactly that: http://darkpatterns.org/ http://darkpatterns.org/