5 ms·
Because "States' rights" has historically been used as a dog-whistle for racism, segregation, and voter suppression. Moreover, the article is referring to city/
by infosample 10y ago
Because "States' rights" has historically been used as a dog-whistle for racism, segregation, and voter suppression. Moreover, the article is referring to city/local government which is different from the state. I don't see how conflating local innovation with state oppression is a liberal agenda.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States%27_rights#States.27_rights_as_.22code_word.22 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States%27_rights#States.27_rig...
- stcredzero 10y agoused as a dog-whistle Such an overloaded term. It is also used to mean "something only some can hear, but I can't." States have also been a source of innovation. California, Oregon, and Washington were noted as "bellwether" states, whose pioneering policies were sometimes adopted by other states. California's pollution/vehicular laws have been a force for positive change and innovation in the auto industry.
- Bjorkbat 10y agoYou could argue that it was the cities that gave these states such pioneering policies. Urban California is a pretty liberal place, but rural California really isn't. Granted, I have my doubts it would be as conservative as the Deep South, but if Central California were a state of its own they'd probably repeal a number of these "pioneering" laws that cut into farm profits. I would argue that states with a liberal voting record also likely have a majority urban population of registered voters, even if we're talking about a large state with plenty of land being used for natural resources.