3 ms·
That link's info is so stupid. They say they know who did it, but they won't say because they don't want to alert the guilty party before the investigation is o
by armandososa 11y ago
That link's info is so stupid. They say they know who did it, but they won't say because they don't want to alert the guilty party before the investigation is over. Guess what? the people who did it know they did it!
Also, the note says that the info is on "Amazon's sales portal" WTF?
- jordigh 11y agoYeah, looks like reporters can't figure out that "Amazon" means more than a website to buy things from.
- rdtsc 11y ago> Guess what? the people who did it know they did it! But they don't know the authorities know who did it.
- yoo1I 11y agoUnless they of course they read the news, which is something that seems likely. ... which, of course, was the original point.
- rdtsc 11y ago> ... which, of course, was the original point. Right, which explains they they were reluctant to put it in the news i.e. "... but they won't say because they don't want to alert the guilty party before the investigation is over." So it doesn't seem completely illogical why they'd do it as gp post suggests.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- armandososa 11y agoIf you, as a kid, broke a window in your school, and the principal is, like, "Look, we've seen the surveillance video and we know who did it, but we ain't saying anything until next friday", you'll know for sure you have until friday to lawyer up or skip town or whatever kids do.
- patrickaljord 11y agoActually, when schools say so it usually means they're bluffing, the cameras were broken, they have no clue who did it and they're counting on fear to make people confess.
- basicplus2 11y agocould be normal political process.. "hey Fred we won't tell anyone it was you if you support my outrageous bill which enriches my personal fortune some more.."