3 ms·
Thats true, but in a typed, structured language, you generally build some kind of data structure to deserialize responses into. With REST endpoints, each respon
by kazagistar 11y ago
Thats true, but in a typed, structured language, you generally build some kind of data structure to deserialize responses into. With REST endpoints, each response can be translated to a specific predefined object in a client library. GraphQL seems to, by design, ignore this kind of usage in favor of the "heterogenus untyped dictionary responses"... do I really have to write custom data types for every single different query?
- e1g 11y agoI think get this now - with SOAP/RPC/REST we can establish the interaction contract by explicitly defining inputs and outputs. With that contract, we can draw clearly defined system boundaries, give better assurances to the developer that they are doing the right thing, and improve testing. You're right - in the scale of app-level problems, GraphQL is just a low-level protocol. It requires language-specific libs to address these higher-level problems (provide interfaces, structs, query typing, etc). As a very basic example, programatically building a GraphQL query is unnecessary complex outside of JS because many languages don't yet have a QueryBuilder for the GraphQL syntax. There are some community efforts, but as of yet no heavy corporate players to drive GraphQL-specific dev (e.g. like Pivotal/Sensio/Sencha did for their respective fields).