4 ms·
Why do you only have to go after one side? Both sides (the corruptor and the corrupted) can and should be held accountable. Holding Shkreli accountable is more
by ZenoArrow 11y ago
Why do you only have to go after one side? Both sides (the corruptor and the corrupted) can and should be held accountable. Holding Shkreli accountable is more than just a token gesture, and no charges would've been brought against him if no laws were broken.
- koolba 11y agoI fail to see what laws he's broken. If you're going to allow a "free market" healthcare industry, this is the result. Being a dick isn't a crime. Neither is being a price gouger.
- ZenoArrow 11y ago> "I fail to see what laws he's broken." Take a look then... http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-are-the-charges-against-martin-shkreli-2015-12-17 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-are-the-charges-again...
- koolba 11y ago> Take a look then... > http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-are-the-charges-again.. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-are-the-charges-again.... Did you actually read that article? It has nothing to do with price gouging prescription drugs. That's for an unrelated securities fraud charge for juggling hedge fund money. I'm not saying he's not at fault in that situation (honestly not sure) but it's unrelated.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- ZenoArrow 11y agoIf you want something closer to daraprim: http://www.legalreader.com/distribution-network-for-daraprim-may-violate-antitrust-laws/ http://www.legalreader.com/distribution-network-for-daraprim...
- koolba 11y agoThat's definitely closer but he hasn't been charged with anything on it. The only charges are for (unrelated) securities fraud.