> In the full paper, the author makes explicit his choice to use the contemporary American sense of the word "liberal." Really? That's interesting, since the d

> In the full paper, the author makes explicit his choice to use the contemporary American sense of the word "liberal." Really? That's interesting, since the definition given in the article contradicts that. I guess the real question is how he measured "liberalism". E.g., did he ask people who they voted for, or how much they gave to charity, or what?