3 ms·
Not much about Hitler is news to me, from any of these responses. I'm not discussing Hitler and what we can learn from him, however. I'm talking about the boo
by capote 10y ago
Not much about Hitler is news to me, from any of these responses.
I'm not discussing Hitler and what we can learn from him, however. I'm talking about the book, for which my point stands. It's very poorly written, full of hatred, and appeared of little intellectual use to me from the passages I've read. It's total garbage.
Maybe you and all my downvoters can actually answer my question, which still stands and is reasonable: what kind of discussion do the annotations present? I'm only curious.
- elorant 10y agoThe annotations could give historical context and try to debunk his arguments. A lot of Hitler's arguments are based on exuberant lies. For example, in the English translation I tried to read once upon a time the translator mentions that the first half of the book was written while Hitler was imprisoned in a fortress. To some extend I guess that would justify his anger. That, and the fact that his was a fucking psychopath.