Thank you for the compliment, I appreciate it. When I first started the project I was trying to find my way and, even though I didn't make the site to compete w

Thank you for the compliment, I appreciate it. When I first started the project I was trying to find my way and, even though I didn't make the site to compete with Wikipedia, I found myself comparing the site to Wikipedia due to the similarities in output, and the differences in the way the site was constructed. I found it quite fascinating that two different software systems could create similar results. But after a while I found the comparisons restrictive. One one hand, as you say, the Newslines format doesn't deal with the kind of articles you mention. I think those kind of articles have traditionally worked fairly well on Wikipedia, but many other kinds of articles, especially news-based (although there are others e.g. medical articles) don't fit very well. Many Wikipedians don't understand that boundary. On the other hand, the format I am working on can do much more than Wikipedia, so I've generally left those comparisons behind now, and am looking forward to the next benchmark.