I think you're missing the point of man vs machine competitions when we're talking about testing intelligence. Machines are obviously better at everything requ

I think you're missing the point of man vs machine competitions when we're talking about testing intelligence. Machines are obviously better at everything requiring fast-twitch reflexes and massive data analysis. There's nothing interesting in a competition there. In Starcraft, the fear is that machine-level micro may make it completely pointless. A human could play strategically better and still lose because the physics of moving a mouse are different than the physics of a transistor.