5 ms·
None of the results on the first page of google contain more than the first few sentences of the article. I think I got the gist of the article from those two
by olympus 10y ago
None of the results on the first page of google contain more than the first few sentences of the article. I think I got the gist of the article from those two sentences, but it is kind of annoying to not have the details or nuance that I'm sure is present in the rest of the article.
Given the number of WSJ articles I've seen recently, I am getting suspicious that one of the following is happening:
1. A lot of HNers upvoting articles without reading them
2. HNers are getting past the paywall (illegally)
3. The WSJ staff is upvoting their own articles to get a page view boost (and thus a few more ad dollars)
Of course, there could just be more people on HN that pay for the WSJ than I thought.
- morgante 10y ago> 2. HNers are getting past the paywall (illegally) It's not illegal to bypass a paywall by Googling the article. They literally programmed the paywall to work that way. It's how I read (and upvoted) the article. If Googling it doesn't let you get past the paywall, try incognito.
- SixSigma 10y agoconsidering not one of the current 15 comments is about the content of the OP ....