> But that's pretty much what Aaronson is implying. That physics can be cold, calculating, unbiased while the social sciences are the opposite. Sure, and I ag

> But that's pretty much what Aaronson is implying. That physics can be cold, calculating, unbiased while the social sciences are the opposite. Sure, and I agree that it's not necessarily true. I just wanted to point out that I was never claiming physics to be unbiased. :)