It does seem to run straight into the 'harmful interference' part of part 15. I've seen people in previous discussions (mostly around the 'rogue ap containment

It does seem to run straight into the 'harmful interference' part of part 15. I've seen people in previous discussions (mostly around the 'rogue ap containment' feature of some wireless access points) try to argue that only 'dumb' broadband jammers fall afoul of the limitations on jammers, and that 'smart' or protocol aware jammers wouldn't. I don't agree, and based on the ruling against the conference centre that was abusing the AP containment feature of their wifi AP's to block other peoples wifi signals, I'm guessing that the FCC doesn't think so either.