3 ms·
No but corruption is illegal. Stealing is illegal. And many things he did while legal, were highly immoral, such as: lying, cheating, investing capital in weap
by sametmax 11y ago
No but corruption is illegal. Stealing is illegal.
And many things he did while legal, were highly immoral, such as: lying, cheating, investing capital in weapon makers and companies doing the opposite of what he is defending now, tax optimization, heavy lobying, retaining a huge part of capital and not letting it flows in the economy, abusing monopoly, patent trolls (and other kind of extorsions), censorship, helping dictatures, etc.
He earned a lot of money doing so, and the cumulated consequences of those are huge. The fact that people are so quick to forgive and forget those prove that not only he got top noch PR people, but that people are ready to accept anything with a good PR.
Sometimes I wonder if humanity deserve freedom, because it seems it's wired to go in the exact opposite direction and love to allow bad people to shine. Democracy is a long term process, not a 5 minutes vote. It requires you to not allow those persons to mess with the system, then get your blessing years later.
- forgetsusername 11y ago>were highly immoral Your profile says you blog about porn. Personally, I'm a consumer and have no issue. But you have a lot of nerve lecturing people about immorality. That isn't the most "above board" industry, and it may have even harmed a person or three. >but that people are ready to accept anything with a good PR. Yeah, nobody "gets it" but you...
- sametmax 11y agoA lot of men watch porn, few men corrupt governments and finance weapons. Your take.
- WalterBright 11y ago> patent trolls Microsoft has probably been the least aggressive of the larger software companies in the use of patents. While Gates ran it, I don't recall them ever using patents to shut down competitors. They did collect a "war chest" of patents, but as a defensive "mutually assured destruction" strategy. Microsoft was famously sued by Apple over "look and feel" copyrights. After that, who could blame them for amassing a large patent portfolio?