I'm not the person you responded to, but I found it interesting that you and I both hold positions of moral objectivity, yet you say we can't use animals for fo

I'm not the person you responded to, but I found it interesting that you and I both hold positions of moral objectivity, yet you say we can't use animals for food, and I say it's perfectly moral, or even amoral. The funny thing is, though, we can't go much further than this in discussing it. You're most likely citing science and evidence of similarities and differences (or the lack thereof) between the cognitive capabilities of animals and humans, which I have to reject as taking too much liberty in order to draw such conclusions. And I'm citing the foundations of reality laid down very firmly by my religion, which undoubtedly you can't help but reject along with my conclusions. So we're at an impasse.