s/facetious/fallacious :-) Of course, what the author meant is that the set of non-transcendental numbers has measure zero. This implies, among other things,

s/facetious/fallacious :-) Of course, what the author meant is that the set of non-transcendental numbers has measure zero. This implies, among other things, that a number chosen randomly from, say, [0,1] is transcendental with probability 1.