3 ms·
To reason that there is no god is not based on factual observation. To reason that there is a god is not based on factual observation. I don't need to pigeon-h
by kls 17y ago
To reason that there is no god is not based on factual observation. To reason that there is a god is not based on factual observation.
I don't need to pigeon-holing anyone anywhere the nuances I highlighted are based on the real world definitions not ones I invented. The only conjecture that I added was my personal view that lumping agnostics (by definition) in with atheist is to deny an agnostic a more robust view on things, something that neither the religious nor atheist tend to appreciate.
--please have at least few facts you can back up
That's all I was talking about was true facts, it funny how emotions cripple people logically and blind them from the true quest for knowledge.