2 ms·
It's absolutely a good thing. We need some of our cells to die as our tissues develop, society needs people to die in order to develop. A society without deat
by stephencanon 11y ago
It's absolutely a good thing. We need some of our cells to die as our tissues develop, society needs people to die in order to develop. A society without death would be a stagnant hell.
- aninhumer 11y agoWould it? Perhaps we wouldn't be so cagey around racist grandparents (or their equivalent) if they weren't going to die soon. I think it's an incredibly pessimistic view of humanity to suggest social change can only come about through death. Moreover, I think this argument tends to come solely from people trying to excuse death, rather than any kind of reasonable analysis.
- stephencanon 11y agoThe problem is that in a world without aging and natural death, your racist great-great-grandparents have (effectively) all of the resources and power, and therefore no reason to listen to you at all. Yes, this is a pessimistic viewpoint, but I think it's also a realistic one.