3 ms·

I'm not sure that's an intelligent or rational decision to eat meat. The statement that you don't care about animal welfare or animal cruelty is simply a statem

I'm not sure that's an intelligent or rational decision to eat meat. The statement that you don't care about animal welfare or animal cruelty is simply a statement with no rational foundation. For example, you would probably disagree with human cruelty, so why agree with animal cruelty? There's a rational argument to be made why you don't care, but simply stating that you don't care isn't really an argument at all.

techiferous 17y ago
But there's one thing I admire about blintson's position: It was intentional. He actually thought about it and made a decision. For too many people, meat-eating is a mindless default. You raise a good point, though. Unless blinston also doesn't care about human welfare, it leaves the question unanswered as to why he would care about humans and not animals.