3 ms·
There was no good case because, as the article explains in quite a lot of detail, the team was instructed not to interview anyone in any position of responsibil
by wwwdonohue 11y ago
There was no good case because, as the article explains in quite a lot of detail, the team was instructed not to interview anyone in any position of responsibility at Goldman/Paulson. It also explains, in quite a lot of detail again, how Goldman was not simply "assembling a security of mortgage bonds." There was quite likely intentional fraud involved.