3 ms·
Stopping the acceptance of potential grantees is just putting an inefficient barrier to entry of new people. The end result of limiting people rather than a bas
by danieltillett 11y ago
Stopping the acceptance of potential grantees is just putting an inefficient barrier to entry of new people. The end result of limiting people rather than a base quality is that it would favour the old over the young which I don’t think is a good outcome.
- erikpukinskis 11y agoYou will have to argue it's less efficient than the current system. You can't just state that it is so. As for favoring the old, all you have to do is require people to regularly re-apply. There's no reason you need to hop the line after the end of your term. And you seem to be assuming that the waitlist will be prohibitively long, but the longer the waitlist the more labor you have for growing the grant pool, so it naturally self-regulates.