3 ms·
The only way to truly solve this problem is on-premise devices that do not push data to Kite, honestly. I'd need to ignore every file I have.
by fweespee_ch 10y ago
The only way to truly solve this problem is on-premise devices that do not push data to Kite, honestly.
I'd need to ignore every file I have.
- LeifCarrotson 10y agoWhy does the device need to be on-premise? Would a Github Enterprise-like setup, where you have a dedicated Kite instance/VPS at their datacenter, work for you?
- fweespee_ch 10y agoContractual agreements, NDAs, etc. might make it impossible to disclose work product and/or source code to a 3rd party which would include Kite. > If you're a contract developer, or a developer working full-time for a consulting firm, you might not have the authority to determine for yourself whether it's contractually allowable to upload code to Kite's servers. But if you're working for a pro shop, you can bet every dollar in your pocket that the contracts your firm has with its clients technically prohibit it. As tptacek said, you might be prohibited and/or not have the authority to do so. > Why does the device need to be on-premise? Would a Github Enterprise-like setup, where you have a dedicated Kite instance/VPS at their datacenter, work for you? We run GitLab on-premise so I'm not familiar enough to answer. However, if by "their" you mean Kite? Yeah, that won't work as its essentially the same thing. [e.g. Disclosing it to a 3rd party outside of my control]
- simonw 10y agoGitHub Enterprise allows you to run a dedicated instance on a virtual machine in your own datacenter, which lets you keeps all of your stuff behind your own firewall.