2 ms·
It should be - changing "wikipedia" to "fan wiki" would be far less misleading.
by kevinnk 11y ago
It should be - changing "wikipedia" to "fan wiki" would be far less misleading.
- bobwaycott 11y agoExcept the title is reporting what Pegg said, right? So, wouldn't it be better for the title to report Pegg exactly, and not corrected? Perhaps they should just have quotes to indicate.
- kevinnk 11y agoNo? The purpose of the title should be to describe the content of the article. If reporting what Pegg said exactly makes the title misleading there's no reason to quote him. Even if you wanted to use his words exactly I would have put "fan website 'Memory Alpha'".