4 ms·
Slightly misleading headline. Basically they haven't confirmed it's a drone so they can't rule anything out, or as he puts it "it could have been a plastic bag
by k-mcgrady 11y ago
Slightly misleading headline. Basically they haven't confirmed it's a drone so they can't rule anything out, or as he puts it "it could have been a plastic bag or something". They don't seem to have any evidence suggesting it's a plastic bag and not a drone (and vice versa).
- JoeAltmaier 11y ago...or any evidence that it existed at all? That's certainly news.
- jobu 11y agoIt's unclear to me why they think it was a drone or a bag instead of a bird. This whole thing seems overblown. They have no idea what they hit, and it didn't cause any damage to the plane.
- stupidcar 11y agoUm, the whole point of the article was that "they" don't think it was a drone. The idea that it was a drone seems to have come entirely from a single tweet by the local police force, which the media jumped on.
- 21 11y agoPlanes should have a camera in the front/nose (like newer Airbuses have in the tail).