3 ms·
As an ignorant spectator I appreciate the balance provided by your comment. However, I wish you would have provided some concrete examples of which wheels they
by JamesSwift 11y ago
As an ignorant spectator I appreciate the balance provided by your comment. However, I wish you would have provided some concrete examples of which wheels they are reinventing, and how those wheels exist in other solutions.
- X86BSD 11y agoListen to this discussion[0] which highlights the point I am making. I set the marker for the relevant "container" comment but watch the entire thing to understand more fully what I and others are saying and why. [0] https://youtu.be/Ya6h2zKlpaQ?t=1h8m11s https://youtu.be/Ya6h2zKlpaQ?t=1h8m11s
- i4k 11y agoContainer technology is grounded on namespaces and cgroups. Both technologies existed long time ago. Linux namespace is a very limited implementation of Plan9's namespace. Solaris and FreeBSD, to cite only the most famous, have resource limits database for process groups.