3 ms·
That's basically it. SubSonic hasn't seen much major work in years while MadSonic seems to be an active project adding features and support.
by Veratyr 11y ago
That's basically it. SubSonic hasn't seen much major work in years while MadSonic seems to be an active project adding features and support.
- throwanem 11y agoWhat features? What bugs? I haven't been able to find any substantive answer to either question. Until I do, I see no reason to care about Madsonic.
- Veratyr 11y agoThere's a comparison page for features here: http://beta.madsonic.org/pages/compare.jsp http://beta.madsonic.org/pages/compare.jsp And a changelog here: http://beta.madsonic.org/pages/changelog.jsp http://beta.madsonic.org/pages/changelog.jsp
- throwanem 11y agoNeat, thanks. If you're anything to do with Madsonic development, you might think about making that comparison page a lot easier to find. It doesn't seem to be linked anywhere very much. I'm also uncertain how "optional video player" isn't listed as a Subsonic feature, when 5.x (and I think later 4.x as well) can stream video. I mean, I've actually streamed video from my Subsonic 5 instance, so...