4 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intellig... This is a false statement: The
by cb18 10y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intellig...
This is a false statement: The overwhelming consensus by scientists at reputable top universities don't allege this at all.
- kenjackson 10y agoI figured that this is where it came from. These are generally fringe researchers, led by the author herself, Gottfredson. As was commonly noted at the time... few who signed it were measurement experts. Note the lack of prestigious programs of the signatories. This is the Wall Street Journal fringe. Certainly not the mainstream of top researchers in the field.
- cb18 10y agoYour trying hard, but you seem to have no idea what you are talking about. "This is the Wall Street Journal fringe." It ran in the journal Intelligence signed by their editorial board. Who are these "non-fringe" you speak of? People who tell you what you want to believe? HuffPo bloggers? Or are you just blowing hot air, totally ignorant of this field in general, and decided to call some people you've never heard of "fringe"...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]