3 ms·
That sounds reasonable, but the article says it was also about demonstrating consensus: "In the 1960s, refereeing emerged as a symbol of objective judgement an
by ktRolster 11y ago
That sounds reasonable, but the article says it was also about demonstrating consensus:
"In the 1960s, refereeing emerged as a symbol of objective judgement and consensus in science."
- tamana 11y agoThat statement is absurd on its face, the system is designed to be subjective, not objective.
- ktRolster 11y agoYour assessment would be more convincing if you had actually read the article, or even had any evidence at all to back up your point. Who are people going to believe? An article in Nature about the history of peer review, or you, who has no evidence?