4 ms·
> C# has partial classes > C# can have multiple classes in a single file Perhaps there are others, but these have nothing to do with the CLR. A JVM language c
by recursive 11y ago
> C# has partial classes
> C# can have multiple classes in a single file
Perhaps there are others, but these have nothing to do with the CLR. A JVM language could easily have these features if the language supported it.
- draw_down 11y agoRight, that's why it says "C# has", not "CLR has".
- bmay 11y agoIt says both - those "C# has" bullets are under a "CLR has…" header.
- RubyPinch 11y ago> It also bleeds into differences between C# and Java whose features often include compiler-level-only features that the underlying VirtualMachine is not cognizant of. aka "if the list says C#, its because it applies to C# and not CLR"
- shrewduser 11y agoit still confuses the issue as the title says it's a CLR vs JVM comparison, there are dozens of languages on each so i don't see why they're bringing C# vs java into it.