3 ms·
Your reply isn't actually to what I said, but I'll respond to you: The video is not the harm; the original taunting is. If it's a manner of protecting a minor
by Semiapies 17y ago
Your reply isn't actually to what I said, but I'll respond to you:
The video is not the harm; the original taunting is. If it's a manner of protecting a minor, we can talk about pulling the video down.
If the kids were selling the video and making money off it, we can talk about prosecuting them.
- kelnos 17y agoWhy is making money off of something the threshold for prosecution? Is the video (or the act itself) somehow less harmful to someone when it isn't commercially viable?