3 ms·
Agree. > developed (after but) independently of RxJava, without inspiration, reinvention, or relation. It's the usual Google style of software development: Th
by airless_bar 10y ago
Agree.
> developed (after but) independently of RxJava, without inspiration, reinvention, or relation.
It's the usual Google style of software development:
Thinking they are the smartest people on earth, not needing to even have to look at all the lessons learned outside of their bubble and believing that the "Google" brand creates adoption by itself, so it doesn't even have to be particularly good.
I wonder how long they can ignore the rest of the world until they are left completely behind from a knowledge/technology perspective.
Go suggests that it's at least 30 years of ignoring outside progress.
- brudgers 10y agoI don't think Go is Google ignoring progress. It is Google building a language that meets its staffing strategy. Google hires people fresh out of CS programs who studied algorithms and are scholed in forloops for Java/Python/C++. Go is lingua franca for Google engineers. Google has a stance on DSL's; they're not the way forward. The mistake is to think that Google developed Go for the larger community. It's out there and promoted to help recruiting. It's not out there for community input on the direction of Go-lang future development.