> but a ridiculous attempt to use a legal loophole Which is funny because my mental default is that publishers try to use legal arguments to fight adblockers.

> but a ridiculous attempt to use a legal loophole Which is funny because my mental default is that publishers try to use legal arguments to fight adblockers. It somehow feels like turning evil to me that one might use the same means to enforce an adblock positive position. It appears to me to be morally wrong in both cases.