2 ms·
Sure, but we all know costs of a litigation which most sellers on Amazon can't afford - Amazon takes most of the profit, 15% default fees leave very little to n
by bitL 11y ago
Sure, but we all know costs of a litigation which most sellers on Amazon can't afford - Amazon takes most of the profit, 15% default fees leave very little to normal sellers, usually under 5% as the (re-)pricing competition is now algorithmic, resembling HFT. Then if you want to have your product featured on Amazon (meaning your offer will be the default one even if it is more expensive than somebody else's), you need to contact the category manager and it's up to their discretion to decide (which reeks of a high potential of corruption/profit sharing etc). On one hand it's pretty cool you can automate price responses and very beneficial to the customer, on the other the game has an increasing risk of being rigged.
- jhall1468 11y ago> Sure, but we all know costs of a litigation which most sellers on Amazon can't afford That's an excellent argument for changing how patent litigation works, but that has nothing to do with Amazon. > Amazon takes most of the profit, 15% default fees leave very little to normal sellers The trade-off being potentially billions of eyes on your product. Again, that has nothing to do with IP.