3 ms·
This is a bit more technical, but still somewhat on topix. Andrew Gelman did a great "criticism" of Bayesian analysis on April Fools 2008: http://www.stat.col
by JeffJenkins 17y ago
This is a bit more technical, but still somewhat on topix. Andrew Gelman did a great "criticism" of Bayesian analysis on April Fools 2008:
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2008/04/problems_with_b.html http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2008...
Followed later by his response to himself with some other statisticians:
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2008/07/responses_to_my.html http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2008...
- MikeCapone 17y agoHere's a BloggingHeadsTV episode where Gelman discusses this (among other things) with Eliezer Yudkowsky: http://lesswrong.com/lw/1bf/bhtv_eliezer_yudkowsky_and_andrew_gelman/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/1bf/bhtv_eliezer_yudkowsky_and_andre...