2 ms·
The lack of threading is what really kills the usefulness of Slack. This is why we settled on Flowdock in our company. If you don't have threading, you lose th
by jwr 11y ago
The lack of threading is what really kills the usefulness of Slack. This is why we settled on Flowdock in our company.
If you don't have threading, you lose the one best feature of those new chat solutions, the single advantage they have over decades-old IRC: conversations at least slightly detached from time. On Slack, you have to be there all the time in order not to miss things or to participate in just about any conversation. If you aren't, soon it will be too late and no one will know what you're replying to.
As for other advantages, I noticed that one of the biggest uses is file exchange. If there was another simple way to just drag&drop a file somewhere and have people access it, those chat apps would see less use. But there isn't.
I haven't seen the bad effects in our company. Perhaps they occur at larger company sizes.
- robaato 11y agoAm I the only one who regrest the demise of nntp and good news readers? Threading was great, and I found it very efficient to get through a lot of stuff. With the switch to html based forums, my personal efficiency plummeted. But I went where the good conversations were. Strikes me that the reported issues with Slack are just the next generation...