2 ms·
It's amusing to see this as something of a novelty. In India, buses like these ply regularly[1] (for example between Bangalore and Chennai, or Bangalore and Hyd
by msravi 11y ago
It's amusing to see this as something of a novelty. In India, buses like these ply regularly[1] (for example between Bangalore and Chennai, or Bangalore and Hyderabad) and are pretty popular. But then, the reason for the popularity might be the fact that flight tickets (arriving at approx. the same time in the morning) cost about 3x that of a sleeper bus service[2]. WiFi isn't included though.
1. http://www.ksrtc.in/AWATAROnline/jqreq.do?hiddenAction=HandleTopDestinations&from=Bangalore&to=Chennai&hiddenStartPlaceID=41&hiddenEndPlaceID=276 http://www.ksrtc.in/AWATAROnline/jqreq.do?hiddenAction=Handl...
2. https://www.cleartrip.com/flights/itinerary/6830699ffb-d1f9-4a08-ae85-5f41517cc76f/review https://www.cleartrip.com/flights/itinerary/6830699ffb-d1f9-...
- mc32 11y agoIt's not that it's novel. It's that it might work despite the nature of the economy. That's to say, buses were a not uncommon mode of inter-city travel up and till the late 50's after that cars dominated and left cheap buses (and passenger rail) behind. So, most Americans of upper lower class and above more or less dismissed buses as only something really poor people, some students and geriatrics used. Buses, in most people's minds had had their golden age, peak bus was behind us. So, in that atmosphere betting on buses is bold. It's like someone betting on airlines in some poor region (it's bold but with the right circumstance, it might work).