4 ms·
As a tourist in CA in 2009, I had to catch a train from LA to SF. I was stunned to find that a train service for these two heavily-populated metropolises only r
by vacri 11y ago
As a tourist in CA in 2009, I had to catch a train from LA to SF. I was stunned to find that a train service for these two heavily-populated metropolises only ran every second day. Had to catch a bus to Bakersfield to get a connecting train. Different story on the right coast, where inter-city trains are much more part of life (though yes, the distances are generally smaller).
> Why would you sleep on a bus for six-and-a-half hours when you could sleep on a plane for one hour? Well, um, hmmmmm. I’m not actually sure.
Because the time from take-off to landing is only one hour, but the time to "catch a plane from X to Y" is considerably more - getting to the airport (usually not in a convenient location), going through check-in/luggage and security, boarding, alighting, luggage collection, getting from the airport to your destination... whereas buses tend to start and finish in the centre of town, where there's usually easy transport everywhere else.
- cjensen 11y agoThat's not correct -- the Coast Starlight runs daily from Oakland/Emeryville to Los Angeles. Amtrak hates to run non-daily trains. The twin problems of the route are (1) the train is very late very often and (2) the route is inefficient (because the geography is inconvenient) and takes all day to traverse.
- vacri 11y agoPerhaps things have changed, or perhaps there was an interruption to the schedule when I was there? The 'every second day' thing was from the ticket seller at Union Station in LA.