3 ms·
She had run out of money to pay people with, yet kept them in the dark about it and had them continue coming to work.
by deciplex 10y ago
She had run out of money to pay people with, yet kept them in the dark about it and had them continue coming to work.
- dang 10y agoSupposing that to be true, the uncharitable statement does not follow and the personal attack is not justified.
- deciplex 10y agoIt follows well enough. The first part "glad this person isn't leading me" is a statement of personal preference based on the facts revealed in the article, and the second portion "they clearly don't care about their employees" is a justified thing to say of someone who puts people on the clock without a way to pay for them. Had it not worked out in the end, and were we instead reading about how Gobble employees did not receive their final month's pay after the company went under, you would not be able to mod away the justified incriminations that would be up and down the thread for it on this board, but good fortune in this case still does not justify it (and we wouldn't be criticizing Ooshma's failure to secure funding).