4 ms·
The answer (assuming this is the same story I wanted to reference) is that the credit card companies just considered the existing fraud to be a cost of doing bu
by scott_s 11y ago
The answer (assuming this is the same story I wanted to reference) is that the credit card companies just considered the existing fraud to be a cost of doing business. Yes, instituting these new chips will lead to less fraud, but it also has a big cost. For a long time, they looked at these two costs, and went with the cost from fraud.
Of course, that analysis ignores the very painful cost to consumers of identify theft, which is why I'm glad they're finally implementing a more secure system.
- Mandatum 11y agoHence why some giant businesses are run off COBOL and Excel documents. However given the affect of credit card theft on individuals I'd expect law enforcement/legislation to pass to require this.