4 ms·

I know that. There is the possibility though to have a human readable EULA side by side with the lawyer readable one. That would actually be fair towards the us

I know that. There is the possibility though to have a human readable EULA side by side with the lawyer readable one. That would actually be fair towards the users. Here's a good example: https://about.500px.com/terms/ https://about.500px.com/terms/

masklinn 11y ago
> I know that. There is the possibility though to have a human readable EULA side by side with the lawyer readable one. That would actually be fair towards the users. I'm guessing the lawyers would reject that for fear of what'd happen in case of conflicts between the "lawyer" version and reasonable interpretations of the "human-readable" version.
- elcapitan 11y ago
  They use 60 unreadable pages abandoning all my rights on anything i do with the software, they can spend another line declaring that the human version is not binding.
  - masklinn 11y ago
    They're corporate lawyers, do you expect them to have compassion or something? What next, HR putting employees first?
    - elcapitan 11y ago
      I hope your day hasn't been too sad.
      - duaneb 11y ago
        He does have a point. The EULA is inherently user unfriendly and they gain nothing by providing a shorter, possibly contradictory version.